An Analysis of Metaphorical Concepts in Juz’ 21 to 26 of the Holy Qur’an from a Cognitive Perspective

Authors

    Sara Sohrabi Department of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
    Akram Korani * Department of English Language Teaching and Linguistics. Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran Korani.akram@iauksh.ac.ir
    Zohre Sadat Naseri Department of English Language and Literature. Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz. Iran
https://doi.org/10.61838/iki.182

Keywords:

Cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor, Holy Quran, parts 21 to 26

Abstract

Conceptual metaphor is one of the cognitive mechanisms within the field of semantics that offers a distinct perspective on the notion of metaphor. In this view, metaphor is regarded as a mental-linguistic process analyzed thematically within semantic memory. That is, metaphorical terms are associated based on the retrieval of existing information stored in long-term memory. This perspective considers the understanding and expression of abstract concepts through more tangible concepts as an application of metaphor. The Holy Qur’an, as the sacred book of Muslims and the miracle of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), is replete with abstract concepts. To facilitate the understanding of such notions by its audience, the Qur’an employs image schemas and conceptual metaphors. The present study, conducted using a content analysis method, investigates image schemas and conceptual metaphors in Juz’ 21 to 26 of the Qur’an. The findings of the study indicate that with the expansion of the conceptual domains progressing from the beginning toward the end of the surahs, based on the chronological order of revelation, the use of conceptual metaphor has likewise increased. The more the text addresses abstract and unknown concepts, the more frequent the application of conceptual metaphors becomes. Furthermore, no significant difference is observed between the source and target domains in the selected surahs. In conclusion, it is noteworthy that among the various types of conceptual metaphors found in the mentioned surahs, structural metaphors occur with the highest frequency, followed by orientational and ontological metaphors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afrashi, A. (2018). Foundations of Cognitive Semantics. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies Publications.

Ibn Arabi, M. i. A. (2001). Tafsir Ibn Arabi (Interpretations of Abdul Razzaq). Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.

Kovecses, Z. (2014). A Practical Introduction to Metaphor. SAMT Publications.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1992). Metaphors We Live By. Elm Publishing.

Lakoff, G. (2004). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Sooreh Mehr.

Mohammadi Asiabadi, A. (2012). The Volume Schema and Its Application in Expressing Mystical Experiences. Journal of Mystical Literature Research, 6(20).

Mostafavi, H. (2009). Al-Tahqiq fi Kalimat al-Quran al-Karim (Vol. 3). Translation and Publishing Bureau.

Quraishi Banaei, S. A. A. (1991). Qamus al-Quran Al-Kafi. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

Raghib Esfahani, H. i. M. (1991). Al-Mufradat fi Gharib al-Quran. Dar al-Ilm al-Dar al-Shamiyyah.

Tabatabai, S. M. H. (1996). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Quran. Islamic Publications of the Society of Seminary Teachers of QomER -.

Taftazani, S. d. a.-D. (2004). Mukhtasar al-Ma'ani. Dar al-Fikr.

Zamakhshari, A. a.-Q. M. i. U. (1986). Al-Kashaf 'an Haqaiq Ghawamid al-Tanzil. Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-15

Submitted

2025-03-02

Revised

2025-04-21

Accepted

2025-04-30

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Sohrabi, S., Korani, A., & Naseri, Z. S. . (1404). An Analysis of Metaphorical Concepts in Juz’ 21 to 26 of the Holy Qur’an from a Cognitive Perspective. Islamic Knowledge and Insight, 3(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.61838/iki.182

Similar Articles

1-10 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.