A Descriptive-Analytical Study of the Theoretical Perspective and Methods of “Negative or Restrictive Education” in Islamic Education
Keywords:
Innate education, negative education, innate talents, innate flourishingAbstract
The approach of “negative or restrictive” education, as opposed to “positive” education, represents one of the theoretical foundations of Islamic education. The negative (restrictive) method refers to refraining from the use of coercive and prescriptive techniques, which is considered the only path to the flourishing of human innate talents and capabilities. Restrictive education is presented as the sole natural method in the Qur’an, hadiths, and the perspectives of Islamic philosophers. The primary challenge facing the educational system in our country is the dominance of positive methods that have overshadowed restrictive approaches in education. The continuous influx of educational and pedagogical ideas, plans, and programs in families, schools, and educational institutions has increasingly distanced children from innate education—which is self-based, meaningful, and developmental—and has directed them toward positive education, which is externally based, artificial, and imitative. This divergence leads to misalignment and conflict between the inputs and outputs of the country’s educational system. In this study, the two perspectives—“positive education” and “restrictive education”—are first compared descriptively in terms of theoretical foundations and practical methods and analyzed in detail. Ultimately, the “restrictive education method” is examined as the only “effective and elevating” approach in Islamic education, accompanied by conclusions and essential constructive recommendations. The researcher aims to demonstrate that the application of “restrictive education” and the avoidance of positive education, along with presenting instructional content compatible with the innate nature of students, leads to their intellectual flourishing and positions them on the path of creativity and erudition. Educational institutions must revise curricula and implement restrictive instructional programs and teaching methods to assist students in developing individual and social talents and abilities, thereby fostering their creativity and intellectual refinement.
Downloads
References
Ashayeri, H. (2003). Interview with Dr. Hassan Ashayeri. Shogh-e Taghir(6), 8.
Fardansh, H. (1998). Theoretical Foundations of Educational Technology. Dana.
Gardner, H. E. (1991). The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach.
Huxley, A., & Hamidian, S. (2008). Brave New World (4th ed.). Niloufar.
Javadi Amoli, A. (2018). Thematic Interpretation of the Holy Quran (3rd ed., Vol. 11). Esra.
Karimi, A. (2014). Education as Being: How Not to Become. Tarbiat Publications.
Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (1995). Ethics in the Quran. Marefat(13), 17.
Motahhari, M. (1986). Education and Training in Islam (8th ed.). Al-Zahra.
Motahhari, M. (1991). Mutual Services of Iran and Islam. Sadra Publications.
Motahhari, M. (1995). Nature from the Perspective of the Quran and Philosophy. Roshd-e Maaref(15).
Motahhari, M. (1998). Notes (Vol. 2). Sadra Publications.
Naghibzadeh, M. A. (1995). A Look at the Philosophy of Education. Tahouri Publications.
Piaget, J., Mansour, A., & Dadsetan, P. (1984). Genetic Psychology: Psychological Development from Birth to Old Age. SAMT Publications.
Rad, S. M. (2015a). How Not to Raise Our Children! Gol Narges Publications.
Rad, S. M. (2015b). How Not to Teach Our Children! Gol Narges Publications.
Tabatabai, S. M. H., & Mousavi Hamadani, S. M. B. (2003). Tafsir al-Mizan. Islamic Publications.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Seyed Masoud Rad (Author); Vahid Fallah; Seyedeh Esmat Rasouli (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.