Identification of Indicators, Components, and Dimensions of the Epistemology of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Based on the Fundamental Transformation Document
Keywords:
Epistemology, foundations, MOOC, document of transformation, general educationAbstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of identifying the indicators, components, and dimensions of the epistemology of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) based on the Fundamental Transformation Document. The research method, in terms of its aim, was applied, and in terms of its execution method, was qualitative, descriptive, and thematic analysis. The statistical population consisted of experts and professors proficient in information technology and philosophy of education. Using a purposive sampling method and adhering to the principle of theoretical saturation, 12 individuals were selected for interviews and as the sample. Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews. The method of data analysis involved thematic analysis using Maxqda-V18 software. The findings showed that the dimensions of the epistemology of MOOCs include the cultural dimension, technological dimension, philosophical dimension, social dimension, and economic dimension. The cultural dimension includes cultural education, cultural cohesion, training in cultural skills, and the promotion of human values. The technological dimension includes technological infrastructures, research, information technology, and the use of modern technologies. The philosophical dimension includes the philosophy of education, philosophy of learning, philosophy of upbringing, and philosophy of management. The social dimension includes social cooperation, cultural development, social responsibility, and social cohesion. The economic dimension includes financial skills, sustainable development, entrepreneurship, and resource management. These findings can contribute to more effective course design and the enhancement of online education quality, and particularly emphasize the necessity of addressing each of these dimensions in the teaching and learning process.
Downloads
References
Alatrash, R., Chatti, M. A., Ain, Q. U., Fang, Y., Joarder, S., & Siepmann, C. (2024). ConceptGCN: Knowledge concept recommendation in MOOCs based on knowledge graph convolutional networks and SBERT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100193
Badali, M., Hatami, J., Banihashem, S. K., Rahimi, E., Noroozi, O., & Eslami, Z. (2022). The role of motivation in MOOCs’ retention rates: a systematic literature review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00181-3
Calise, M., Kloos, C. D., Reich, J., Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A., & Wirsing, M. (2019). Digital Education: At the MOOC Crossroads Where the Interests of Academia and Business Converge: 6th European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit, EMOOCs 2019, Naples, Italy, May 20-22, 2019, Proceedings (Vol. 11475). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19875-6
Cheng, Y. M. (2024). What makes learners enhance learning outcomes in MOOCs? Exploring the roles of gamification and personalization. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(2), 308-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0097
Cvetković, V. N. (2022). History resurrected (Ideological metamorphoses of the global order). Социолошки преглед, 56(3), 832-872. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg56-40414
De Waard, I. (2015). MOOC factors influencing teachers in formal education. Revista Mexicana de Bachillerato a distancia, 7(13). https://doi.org/10.22201/cuaed.20074751e.2015.13.64998
Gholampour Sadehi, R., Zangooyi, A., Momeni Mahmoeei, H., & Zirak, M. (2024). Platforms and requirements of an in-service training model based on MOOC: A new approach in human resource training. Journal of Human Resource Excellence, 5(3), 1-21.
Hendriks, R. A., de Jong, P. G., Admiraal, W. F., & Reinders, M. E. (2024). Motivation for learning in campus-integrated MOOCs: Self-determined students, grade hunters and teacher trusters. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100158
Jiang, J., & Fryer, L. K. (2024). A scoping review: what kind of built-in social tools keep students in MOOCs? Education and Information Technologies, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12987-3
Julia, K., & Marco, K. (2021). Educational scalability in MOOCs: Analysing instructional designs to find best practices. Computers & Education, 161, 104054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104054
Kahrazi, M., & Khashi Kamalabadi, Y. (2023). Attractiveness, the launchpad for teachers in schools. 9th Scientific Conference on the Development and Promotion of Educational and Psychological Sciences in Iran.
McKay, J. R. (2015). The use of new communications technologies to evaluate and intervene in substance use disorders. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2, 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-014-0017-y
Mirzaei, M. (2022). Investigating the assessment of virtual teaching competencies of teachers in the Shad educational network (case study: primary school teachers in Musian region, Ilam province). Journal of Educational Research, 8(30), 97-111.
Rahimi, A. R. (2024). A tri-phenomenon perspective to mitigate MOOCs’ high dropout rates: the role of technical, pedagogical, and contextual factors on language learners’ L2 motivational selves, and learning approaches to MOOC. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00297-7
Ramezani, F., & Mahmoudi, M. (2020). The role of MOOCs in improving the quality of e-learning. Contemporary Research in Sciences and Research, 2(12), 6-15.
Sarmadi, M. R. (2017). Epistemological analysis of distance education based on constructivist school and Islamic epistemology. Journal of School and Virtual Learning, 4(1), 19-30.
Stracke, C. M., & Trisolini, G. (2021). A systematic literature review on the quality of MOOCs. Sustainability, 13(11), 5817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115817
Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Wu, Y. J., & Goh, M. (2023). Factors of dropout from MOOCs: a bibliometric review. Library Hi Tech, 41(2), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2022-0306
Williams, R. T. (2024). An overview of MOOCs and blended learning: integrating MOOC technologies into traditional classes. IETE Journal of Education, 65(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2024.2303040
Yousefi, Z., & Mahmoudi, M. (2019). The role of MOOCs in learner retention in e-learning environments. 3rd Scientific Conference on Applied Research in Sciences and Technology in Iran.
Zhu, P., Wang, Q., & Dong, Y. (2017). Study on the influence and countermeasures of MOOC on higher education in China. 2017 International Conference on Management, Education and Social Science (ICMESS 2017).
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 سید روحالله موسوی (نویسنده); مهدی محمودی; محمدرضا سرمدی, مرجان معصومی فرد (نویسنده)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
