Teleological and Methodological Analysis of Punishment in Islamic Criminal Policy

Authors

Keywords:

Philosophy of punishment, penal teleology, deterrence, Islamic penal policy, criminal justice

Abstract

The Islamic penal system, as an integral component of a comprehensive religious legal system, adopts a multidimensional approach to the phenomena of crime and deviance. Unlike modern legal schools of thought, which often focus primarily on maintaining public order or rehabilitating offenders within the context of material life, Islamic criminal policy, grounded in distinctive anthropological foundations—such as the dual-dimensional nature and immortality of the human being—pursues broader objectives. Employing a descriptive-analytical method and drawing on library-based sources, this study examines both the “why” of punishment (its philosophy and objectives) and the “how” of punishment (the principles governing its implementation). The findings indicate that, with respect to the “why,” punishment in Islam represents a balanced combination of worldly objectives, including general and specific deterrence and the establishment of justice and security, and otherworldly objectives, including purification from sin, awakening of the innate human disposition (fitrah), and spiritual development. With regard to the “how,” principles such as proportionality between crime and punishment, individualization of punishment, and the principle of precaution in matters involving blood and human life establish a precise framework for implementation that prevents punishment from degenerating into blind retaliation. Ultimately, this article demonstrates that the apparent severity of certain hudud and qisas punishments is, at a deeper level, associated with a life-preserving function aimed at safeguarding collective dignity and the moral well-being of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhund Khorasani, M. K. i. H. (1989). Kifayat al-Usul. Al al-Bayt Foundation.

Al-Hurr al-Amili, M. i. H. (1989). Wasa'il al-Shi'a. Al al-Bayt Foundation.

Al-Kulayni, M. i. Y. q. (1984). Al-Kafi. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyya.

Al-Muhaqqiq al-Hilli, J. f. i. H. (1984). Riyad al-Masa'il fi Bayan al-Ahkam bi al-Dala'il. Al al-Bayt Foundation for the Revival of Heritage.

Al-Shahid al-Awwal, M. i. M. (1990). Al-Lum'a al-Dimashqiyya fi Fiqh al-Imamiyya. Dar al-Turath.

Al-Shartuni, S. i. (1995). Aqrab al-Mawarid fi Fusah al-Arabiyya wa al-Shawarid. Dar al-Uswa lil-Tiba'a wa al-Nashr.

Al-Suyuti, A. a.-R. i. A. B. (1993). Al-Durr al-Manthur fi al-Tafsir bi al-Ma'thur. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Tarifi, A. a.-A. i. M., & Mubarak, A. a.-M. i. K. (2016). Al-Tafsir wa al-Bayan li-Ahkam al-Qur'an. Maktabat Dar al-Minhaj.

Al-Zabidi, M. i. M. (1993). Taj al-Arus min Jawahir al-Qamus. Dar al-Fikr.

Bahnasi, A. F. (1988). Al-Ta'zir fi al-Islam. Mu'assasat al-Khalij.

Copleston, F. (2003). A History of Western Philosophy. Soroush.

Ebrahimpour Lialestani, H. (2008). Objectives and Foundations of Punishment: Two Approaches from Criminal Law and Religious Teachings. Bustan-e Ketab Institute.

Foroutan, R., & Emam, S. M. R. (2021). A Comparative Study of the Principle of Individualization of Punishment in Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence and Iranian Law with Reference to Developments in the Islamic Penal Code. (1).

Ghiasvand, S., Mousavi, S., Zand, F., & Basivand, M. (2023). The Position of the Principle of Individualization of Punishment among the Principles Governing Punishments. Studies in Political Science, Law and Jurisprudence, 9(3).

Ibn Babawayh, M. i. A. (1984). Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih. Islamic Publishing Office.

Iyazi, M. A. (1980). Al-Irtidad fi Ru'yatihi al-Jadida fi al-Kitab wa al-Sunna.

Javadi Amoli, A. (2010). Tasnim. Esra Publishing Center.

Katouzian, N. (2016). Introduction to the Science of Law and the Study of the Iranian Legal System. Enteshar Joint Stock Company.

Khosravi, K. (2018). Rethinking Mercy Killing (Euthanasia) in Islamic Jurisprudence and Positive Law Razavi University of Islamic Sciences]. Mashhad, Iran.

Makarem Shirazi, N. (1995). Tafsir Nemuneh. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyya.

Makarem Shirazi, N. (2000). The Place of Rationality in Islam.

Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (2007). Islamic Legal Theory. Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.

Mohaghegh Damad, S. M. (2022). Principles of Jurisprudence: Criminal Section. Center for the Publication of Islamic Sciences.

Mohammadi Navisi, H. (2018). Foundations of Islamic Law. Hoquq-Pouya.

Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj, a.-Q. (1991). Sahih Muslim. Dar al-Hadith.

Postma, J. (2024). The Principle of Legality in International Criminal Law. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(2), 529.

Pradel, J. (1994). History of Penal Thought. Shahid Beheshti University.

Sadeqi Tehrani, M. (2007). A New Perspective on Women's Rights in Islam. Omid-e Farda.

Sajjadifar, S. M., & Al-Bouyeh, A. (2021). Theological Principles Governing the Legislation of Punishment in Islam. Islamic Theology Quarterly, 30(119).

Salimi, A. H. (2002). Reflections on Hudud and Ta'zir Punishments with Emphasis on Time and Place. Women's strategic studies(1).

Sobhani Tabrizi, J. (2012). Ahkam al-Qisas fi al-Shari'a al-Islamiyya al-Gharra'. Imam Sadiq Institute.

Tabataba'i, S. A. R. (2001). Al-Masa'il fi Bayan Ahkam al-Shar' bi al-Dala'il. Islamic Publishing Institute.

Tabataba'i, S. M. H. (1984). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Islamic Publishing Office.

Varaei, S. J. (2015). Is Every Crime a Sin in an Islamic Government? Islamic Jurisprudence and Foundations of Law(1).

White, R., & Haines, F. (2004). Criminology. Research Institute of Hawzah and University.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Ketabi, M., Sajjadifar, S. M. . ., & Farhoudfar, M. . (1405). Teleological and Methodological Analysis of Punishment in Islamic Criminal Policy. Islamic Knowledge and Insight, 1-18. https://journaliki.com/index.php/journaliki/article/view/598

Similar Articles

1-10 of 252

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.