Islamic Knowledge and Insight

The present study examines, from a jurisprudential and legal perspective, the concept of the “final breath of life” (unstable life) in cases of homicide. The final breath of life constitutes an intermediate condition in which an individual stands on the threshold of death; limited vital signs (such as a weak heartbeat, respiration dependent on mechanical ventilation, or minimal basic biological activity) persist, yet a return to independent and stable life (stable life) is practically impossible. The central question of this research is whether terminating this condition (for example, by withdrawing life-sustaining support) may be regarded as constituting the requisite physical conduct necessary to satisfy the material element of homicide (the deprivation of the life of a living human being possessing full inviolable life), or not. Using an interpretive–analytical method and drawing upon the sources of Imāmī jurisprudence, legal doctrine, and medical science, the findings indicate that in Imāmī jurisprudence the final breath of life is often equated with the separation of the soul from the body, and the individual in such a condition is regarded as legally equivalent to a deceased person; accordingly, acts committed against such a person are considered offenses against a corpse rather than homicide. Article 372 of the Islamic Penal Code (enacted in 2013) explicitly reflects this jurisprudential distinction within Iranian criminal law and allocates responsibility among the involved parties: the first person (the one who creates the condition of unstable life, such as by inflicting the initial injury) is subject to qiṣāṣ (retaliation in kind) or payment of diyah (blood money) for the inflicted injury, while the second person (the one who terminates the final breath of life, such as by withdrawing support without causing a new direct injury) is deemed to have committed an offense against a corpse. Consequently, such conduct generally does not fulfill the material element of homicide or may lack criminal characterization altogether (within the framework of forensic medical determination and the consent of the legal guardian). The central role of Imāmī jurisprudence in defining death on the basis of the separation of the soul, the role of medical science in the precise diagnosis of brain death and unstable life, judicial interpretation of Article 372, and the challenges arising from legislative gaps concerning the precise boundary between life and death constitute key aspects of this research. The study concludes that the jurisprudential and legal distinction between stable life and the final breath of life forms the principal basis for analyzing criminal liability in homicide, and that legislative reconsideration is necessary in order to harmonize the foundations of Imāmī jurisprudence, the findings of modern medical science, and criminal law, so as to eliminate judicial ambiguities and ensure criminal justice.

This study aims to comparatively analyze the number, structure, and conceptual logic of mystical stations and waystations in the thought of Imam Khomeini and Qushayri. The central problem is that the difference between these two mystics in presenting spiritual stations is not merely numerical, but rooted in their epistemological, anthropological, spiritual, and teleological foundations. The research adopts a descriptive-analytical method based on a comparative reading of the major works of both thinkers. The findings indicate that Qushayri, within the framework of classical Sufism, explains stations mainly as a set of virtues, disciplines, and spiritual states, emphasizing repentance, scrupulousness, asceticism, patience, trust, satisfaction, love, knowledge, and sincere servitude. By contrast, Imam Khomeini interprets stations and waystations within the horizon of Shi‘i mysticism, guardianship, monotheism, the removal of dark and luminous veils, presence of heart, the inner meaning of worship, and ascent through the divine names. Thus, in Qushayri’s view, the plurality of stations primarily has an ethical and pedagogical function, whereas in Imam Khomeini’s thought, the waystations of the path acquire meaning in relation to the degrees of monotheism and the realization of servitude. The study concludes that Qushayri is closer to a detailed enumeration of stations and the formation of a pedagogical map for the seeker, while Imam Khomeini gives greater attention to the ontological and monotheistic depth of the waystations. Accordingly, the number of stations in Islamic mysticism is not fixed or merely numerical, but reflects each mystic’s understanding of the human being, religious law, spiritual path, guardianship, and the final goal of mystical journeying.

Social, economic, and cultural transformations over recent decades have reshaped family structures worldwide, leading to single-parent households, blended families, cohabiting relationships, foster and adoptive families, and families formed through assisted reproductive technologies. These changes have resulted in families no longer exclusively performing traditional functions such as caregiving, economic support, education, transmission of values, and child protection, with many responsibilities redistributed to external institutions including the state, courts, schools, and counseling services. Family law in Iran and England, while based on different philosophical, religious, and institutional foundations, responds differently to these developments. In Iran, families remain anchored in lawful marriage and Islamic jurisprudence, with substitution of family functions implemented in limited or case-specific ways. In England, the law emphasizes functional responsibilities and child welfare, providing greater flexibility in recognizing diverse family forms and distributing caregiving and supportive roles across institutions. Comparative analysis demonstrates that in both systems, substitution of family functions does not equate to the elimination of family, but rather reflects the redistribution of roles and responsibilities between the family and social institutions. Effective legal and policy responses must balance stability, child and vulnerable individual protection, and adaptability to emerging social realities. Findings indicate that structural transformations of family necessitate precise legal and institutional design, preserving traditional foundations while adequately responding to contemporary challenges.

The Holy Qur’an has consistently been one of the most significant sources of inspiration in Persian mystical literature, and numerous mystical works have emerged through a profound engagement with Qur’anic concepts and vocabulary. Allameh Hasan-Zadeh Amoli’s poetic composition Daftar-e Del is among the works whose language and semantic structure maintain an extensive relationship with Qur’anic discourse. The present study aims to investigate the manner and function of Qur’anic vocabulary within this poetic collection through the lens of intertextuality. The significance of this research lies in the fact that, despite the existence of studies examining the reflection of the Qur’an in Persian mystical literature, a comprehensive analysis of the intertextual relationships in Daftar-e Del has received relatively limited scholarly attention. This study employs a descriptive–analytical method based on qualitative textual analysis, examining selected instances of Qur’anic vocabulary and expressions found in the verses of the collection. The findings indicate that Allameh Hasan-Zadeh Amoli, through lexical borrowing and semantic re-creation, reproduces Qur’anic concepts within a mystical framework, thereby establishing a profound connection between Persian poetry and revealed divine knowledge.

Circumstantial evidence, as an important instrument of indirect proof in criminal proceedings, plays a fundamental role in discovering truth, establishing judicial knowledge, and achieving criminal justice. The transformation of criminal behavior and the limitations of traditional evidentiary mechanisms have increased the importance of material, moral, scientific, and electronic indications in contemporary legal systems. The present study aimed to comparatively analyze the application of circumstantial evidence in the criminal systems of Iran and Egypt and Islamic jurisprudence. Using a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative approach, this study examined the jurisprudential and legal foundations of circumstantial evidence, its position in criminal proof, and the limitations of its application. The findings indicated that, in Islamic jurisprudence, the validity of circumstantial evidence depends on the type of crime, its degree of certainty, and its compatibility with principles such as the presumption of innocence and the rule of avoiding hudud punishments in doubtful cases. In hudud crimes, the use of circumstantial evidence is more restricted due to the necessity of caution and prevention of unjust convictions, whereas in ta’zir crimes, it has broader applicability. In the Iranian criminal system, circumstantial evidence mainly obtains validity through the formation of judicial knowledge and must be based on objective, assessable, and case-related evidence. Conversely, the Egyptian criminal system, through its emphasis on judicial persuasion, provides greater flexibility in evaluating circumstantial evidence, although judicial decisions must remain reasoned and evidence-based. The comparison demonstrates that the main difference between the two systems is not the acceptance of circumstantial evidence itself but the theoretical foundation and method of applying it. Ultimately, the effective use of circumstantial evidence requires a balance between truth discovery, modern evidentiary developments, and protection of defendants’ rights.

The main objective of this article is to design a model of organizational justice based on Islamic teachings (the Qur’an and Nahj al-Balagha) in public organizations. The research method is mixed (qualitative–quantitative). In conducting this study, in addition to documentary analysis, thematic analysis using MAXQDA 14 software was employed to identify the factors influencing organizational justice based on Islamic teachings. The statistical population in the qualitative phase included all academic experts in the fields of public management and human resource management, as well as seminary faculty members with more than 15 years of work experience who were familiar with the concept of organizational justice based on Islamic teachings; a total of 14 interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was achieved. Based on semi-structured interviews, 8 dimensions, 35 components, and 94 indicators were extracted. In the quantitative phase, a descriptive–survey method was applied. The statistical population consisted of all managers and experts in public organizations in the city of Deyr, from which 187 individuals were selected using Cochran’s sampling method. The results indicated that the dimension of interactional justice (with a coefficient of 0.960) had the highest importance, while the dimension of social justice (with a coefficient of 0.852) had the lowest importance. Ultimately, the final model was presented and validated with four main dimensions, including philosophy and objectives, theoretical foundations, evaluation system, and executive mechanisms.

The present study was conducted with the aim of comparatively analyzing the manifestation of religious knowledge in the mourning rituals of Muharram during two historical periods: the reign of Shah Abbas I of the Safavid dynasty and the reign of Naser al-Din Shah of the Qajar dynasty. This study is organized based on a historical and comparative approach and employs a descriptive-analytical method. The required data were collected through the examination of library sources, historical documents, travelogues, and historical texts. The findings indicate that mourning rituals in both historical periods were not merely individual practices; rather, they functioned as effective instruments for strengthening Shiite identity, creating social cohesion, reproducing religious knowledge, and establishing connections with structures of political power. Although the active presence of rulers, martyrdom-narrative recitation, elegiac preaching, and the use of symbols such as ritual standards and ceremonial insignia were among the common elements of both periods, fundamental differences can also be observed. In the Safavid era, emphasis was placed on elegiac preaching and content grounded in jurisprudential texts and authoritative narrations, whereas the Qajar period, with the expansion of passion plays, dramatic mourning performances, and the incorporation of popular and artistic elements, assumed a more theatrical and complex character. The results suggest that the semantic and epistemic core of these rituals remained stable and enduring over time, while only their performative form and content changed and adapted in accordance with the historical, cultural, and social transformations of each era.

This applied study examines the ethical values of contentment (riḍā), trust (tawakkul), and entrustment (tafwīḍ) from the mystical perspective of Imam Khomeini. Understanding and realizing mystical stations are contingent upon understanding and realizing the theoretical foundations of mysticism, an issue that has received attention in the major works of mystics who explicate the school of Ibn ʿArabī. Imam Khomeini, as a contemporary mystic and commentator of this school, likewise employs certain ontological and anthropological theoretical foundations in explicating mystical stations. This research adopts a descriptive–analytical method and is conducted through library research, drawing on books and scholarly articles. First, the concepts of the stations of spiritual wayfaring were examined and studied in Imam Khomeini’s major works related to practical mysticism; subsequently, the position of these stations within mystical states and ranks was analyzed, and finally, their degrees were interpreted and justified. The findings indicate that mystical stations differ from one another in terms of depth and richness; moreover, the theoretical foundations of mysticism are interrelated and intertwined. An examination of the explanations provided by the great mystic Imam Khomeini regarding the stations of wayfaring demonstrates the influence and necessity of theoretical foundations for explicating mystical stations. It became clear that the realization of each station of wayfaring depends on a combination of several theoretical foundations, which themselves are interconnected and inseparable. In fact, both the rationale for the necessity of realizing a given station for the spiritual seeker and the explanation of how that station is realized are made possible on the basis of these very principles and theoretical foundations, as demonstrated in this article. From a broader perspective, the fact that stations of wayfaring can be explicated through theoretical mystical foundations, and that these foundations play an effective role in their realization, points to the existence of a linkage between practical mysticism and theoretical mysticism. Imam Khomeini, as a contemporary mystic and commentator, has paid close attention in his philosophical–mystical works to the interconnection and mutual influence between practical and theoretical mysticism, and has demonstrated this linkage throughout his mystical discussions of the stations of wayfaring.